Compare

QuickBoard vs Dynavision D2.

One trains the eyes and hands at a wall. The other trains the feet at the floor. Here is how they differ.

The Dynavision D2 is a wall-mounted light board that records how fast a person sees and reaches for lit targets. QuickBoard is a floor sensor board paired with an iPad app, where the person stands on the board and reacts with the feet. They answer different questions, and some clinics use both.

Last reviewed 2026-10-19. We refresh this page every quarter, next on 2027-01-19. Facts about Dynavision D2 come from its maker's public pages and the studies cited below. Spot something out of date? Email info@thequickboard.com.

Side by side

QuickBoard vs Dynavision D2.

Dynavision D2QuickBoard
What it isA multi-sensory light board that records reaction to light, per the maker. A 4 ft by 4 ft board with 64 LED buttons.A floor sensor board paired with an iPad app.
SetupWall-mounted. Optional mobile stand. A laptop with the software is included.Board on the floor, iPad on a stand.
What the person doesLooks and reaches for lit buttons. Targets hand-eye coordination, peripheral awareness and reaction time.Stands on the board and reacts with the feet at full body weight. Companion iPads add hand targets.
ProgramsSix basic programs and a T-Scope mode. An optional ELITE package adds 35 programs.Pre-built clinical protocols, the Agility Rating, and custom protocol building.
Per-leg dataNot stated in the maker's public pages.Yes. Contact time and reaction time for each leg.
Clinic documentationNot stated in the maker's public pages.Auto-filled CPT 97750 Description and Purpose, plus auto-generated PDF reports.
Public priceNone. The site offers a quote only.HD Sensor Board $2,295. HD Pro $2,495. Software $49.99 to $199.99 a month.
Marketed toOTs, PTs, functional neurologists, hospitals, rehab clinics, athletes and teams, and military users.PT clinics, sports performance, athletic training, fall prevention and neuro rehab, active aging.

Dynavision details read from dynavisioninternational.com on 2026-10-19.

Where Dynavision D2 is the better choice

Vision and reaching are the focus

The D2 is built around visual-motor performance: peripheral awareness, hand-eye work and reaction to light. It has an established place in neuro and vision rehab, and a normative reaction-time data set from 300 healthy adults. If your question is about seeing and reaching, it is the more direct tool.

Where QuickBoard fits

Whole-body response with a per-leg record

The person stands on the board and the feet do the reacting, with cognitive tasks such as Go/No-Go and Stroop layered on top. Every rep records contact time and reaction time per leg, and the report carries billing documentation. Pricing is public.

Evidence, with dates

What the published research says.

Each device has published work. The populations differ, so read them against your own patients.

Dynavision D2, published studies we confirmed

Wells et al., J Sports Sci Med, 2014: reliability of D2 reaction-time measures in 42 active young adults. Clark et al., Clin J Sport Med, 2017: central and peripheral vision reaction times in patients with post-concussion visual dysfunction, against a normative database. Blackwell et al., Am J Occup Ther, 2020: normative reaction data for healthy adults.

Galpin et al., JSCR, 2008

Active adults new to agility training did four weeks of foot speed and reaction work on the board. Foot speed improved 26% and reaction time 19%. The training also carried over to a change-of-direction test that was not part of the program, about 0.45 seconds, roughly 7%. The control group did not improve. Active adults, not athletes or patients.

Zhang et al., Frontiers in Physiology, 2026

Randomized research with 64 men's college basketball players. Four weeks of QuickBoard training cut Agility T-Test time 5.4%, versus 2.3% for agility ladder training. Independent group; the paper states no QuickBoard role in design, funding or authorship.

QuickBoard's published research centers on athletes and active adults. It does not include a concussion or vision study. Full library on the research page.

FAQ

Common questions.

No. They measure different things. The D2 centers on vision and reaching. QuickBoard centers on the feet reacting at full body weight, with per-leg data.

The maker publishes no price and offers a quote. QuickBoard publishes its prices: $2,295 for the HD Sensor Board and $2,495 for the HD Pro, plus software from $49.99 a month.

Yes. A clinic can use the D2 for visual-motor work and QuickBoard for lower-body reaction and symmetry.

The D2 has a longer record in clinical and concussion work, including a normative data set. QuickBoard's studies are in athletic and active-adult groups. Match the study to your population.

15-Minute Virtual Demo

See where QuickBoard fits next to your vision board.

A clinician walks your team through the workflow, runs an Agility Rating session, and shows the auto-generated PDF reports. Bring your comparison questions and we will answer them straight.

Not ready yet? Read the published research →